| Fantech: Technically Speaking |
From TechTalk 57 (Dec
06 - Mar 07) |
How to dertermine and describe fan performance

Print
this Article
IN this, the first of a “Back to Basics” series, we discuss
the all-important issue of how to determine and describe fan performance.
Accurate fan performance is essential information for anyone designing
or specifying an air movement device for a ventilation or air conditioning
system. This and the next issue of Tech Talk will explain: - How a fan’s
airflow and pressure performance is established. - How the performance
is presented to the design engineer in a concise, easily understood format.
|
|
Background
Formerly, and in some countries still, fan performance was presented
in tabular form - thought to be useful for people who did not understand
performance curves. However, in recent decades performance curves for
products have become so common they are almost universally understood.
Curves have the advantage of disseminating much information in a small
space, giving the user an understanding of the complete fan performance
and what safety margin is available. Fantech uses performance curves exclusively
to describe the air-flow pressure performance characteristics of their
fans. But how is a fan curve, or any performance curve, initially created?
A curve
A curve is the result of connecting a series of points to make a continuous
line, the points being derived from some sort of test. An example would
be to consider water flowing from a tap into a pail. With the tap fully
open, measure the amount of water that goes into the pail in one minute.
Next, close the tap a quarter turn and measure the amount of water that
goes into the pail in one minute. Repeat the exercise of closing the tap
a quarter of a turn and measuring the flow of water in one minute. If
the tap takes two full turns from fully open to fully closed, seven readings
will be obtained. As the tap is closed with each quarter turn, the flow
rate of water will reduce until, eventually, the tap is closed and no
water comes through. We can now plot these points on a graph, with the
horizontal axis being the flow rate of the water/minute and the vertical
axis being the tap position. Fig. 1 shows the sort of points that could
be obtained from such a test. The results obtained are not always in an
even line. This is normal and comes from minor errors in the reading of
instruments, etc. Connecting these points on a point-to-point basis, as
in Fig. 2, does not look very good so a ‘curve of best fit’ is usually
adopted, as in Fig.3. The level of inaccuracy introduced by such a measure
is miniscule and can be ignored.
|

Fig. 1 - plot of test results

Fig. 2 - point-to-point connection

Fig. 3 - curve of best fit
|
|
Not simple
Performance testing of fans is not as simple as the above example.
The design of a fan test rig is defined in Test Standard ISO5801:1997,
with its construction having to conform to very strict standards. As well,
the measuring instruments have to be calibrated on a regular basis to
ensure they are providing correct readings. If this is done it is expected
the performance curve of a fan tested on such a rig will be reliable.
Testing a fan is difficult, as the fan is immersed in the medium being
measured, that is, air. An analogy would be testing the performance of
a pump under water, which is also difficult. However, although you cannot
see air, you can feel it because it is moving. It is this particular feature
that makes it possible to determine how much air is being handled by a
fan.
Fig. 4 - Minivent Roof Unit Performance Curves
Velocity
Pressure
Moving air develops a pressure, or head, called Velocity Pressure
and, depending where it is measured in the rig, provides both the Fan
Static Pressure and Fan Velocity Pressure values. With these two values
we can determine the Fan Total Pressure. Static, Velocity and Total Pressures
are explained in Tech Talk No 43, July 2002. A copy can be provided on
request. As with the tap example, there is a facility within the fan test
rig that enables flow of air to be restricted, i.e. imposed pressure loss,
with the value of the loss to be measured as well as the reduced flow
rate. In a fan test, the measurement of the restriction value will be
of pressure rather than turns of a tap, but the outcome will be the same.
A series of coordinates, flow rates and pressures, will be obtained which
can be plotted on a graph so that a curve can be drawn.
Fig. 5 - Axial Flow Fan Performance Curves
Specific speed
Many products, such as centrifugal, mixedflow or fixed pitch axial flow
fans, have a single curve for a fan of a particular size running at a
specific speed. Fig. 4 shows the curves for a range of axial roof units.
The performance of each diameter is shown running at one speed. Adjustable
pitch axial flow fans are different because, for any one size and speed,
the angle of the fan blade can be adjusted from approximately 10° to 40°
in one degree increments. However, showing the performance data for each
pitch angle could result in a very crowded set of curves. This is overcome
by showing the curves in five degree increments (Fig. 5). This set of
curves has the volume/pressure performances in the upper graph and the
power absorbed data in the lower graph. Where a required performance is
between two curves, the angle required is interpolated.
The Standards
The International Standard for airflow testing of fans is ISO5801:1997.
Prior to 1997 many countries had their own standards, dominated by Britain
(BS) and America (AMCA). Their methodology was fairly close. France and
Germany also had standards, with the French version being close to BS
and AMCA, and the German method somewhat different. How this test data
is transformed into a concise, understandable format will be covered in
our next edition.
|